I was so going to blog about the Digg Town Hall Meeting, but…

Town Hall… I didn’t because there wasn’t much to talk about.  A few questions got answered, but for the most part, it was just plain rushed.  A few minutes past an hour into it, Rose and Adelson seemed to have something more important to do, so they were gone.

The one thing that truly stuck out (and hits home with this particular blog) was the discussion of autobury.  Again, it was basically denied, but there were enough hints to draw conclusions about how it works:

The Trigger

Spam buries by users are apparently what triggers a “spam tag” (we’ll use that term, since “autobury” is apparently an incorrect description).  When enough users tag submissions from a particular URL as spam, it is either manually added to the list or is put there as an automated function.  Either way, it makes sense, and I accept that fate for this blog.

This Blog

A brief, Twitter-esque history of this blog in the form of stats.  First 14 stories from it, 8 hit the front page of Digg.  Since then, the following 22 have been removed from upcoming after 20 diggs.  Regardless of who submits, when it’s submitted, and how quickly it gets to 20 diggs, any submissions from this blog will be buried.

What happened?  I was tagged.  This blog was tagged.  I spammed the heck out of it on Digg and other social media sites and now it is no longer capable of hitting the front page.  I deserve the fate because I pushed too hard.  I became addicted to the traffic boosts.

Bottom line: I was a fool.

Any site that is promoted too much will be marked as spam by users and subsequently tagged.  Despite my displeasure of this, I now realize that it was the right fate.  I earned it.

BUT…

The argument comes to mind, “What about arstechnica? GizmodoEngadget?  They are on every day and don’t get tagged!”  Exactly.  They don’t get tagged.  Diggers who are looking for this stuff and subsequently tag a post as spam don’t go after the “old school” blogs, nor do they care about the ones that get a ton of Diggs because they have a ton of traffic.  They target the new blogs, the blogs that the owner submits and shouts frequently, the ones that are hitting the frontpage often “out of the gate” without going through the trials of age.  Even some older blogs can have this happen.  If enough people were to bury every arstechnica story as spam, I believe that the same thing would happen to it.

My only question: is there a way out?  They claim to have contacted people before this fate happens, but I know without a doubt that I was never once contacted about it.  Had I known, I would have definitely stopped.  Is it possible to ask for another chance?  To have the tag removed?  We’ll soon find out, as I am going to ask.  More to come…

* * *

In the meantime, please feel free to read more on this social news blog or visit some of the sites we recommend.

JD Rucker

+JD Rucker is Editor at Soshable, a Social Media Marketing Blog. He is a Christian, a husband, a father, and founder of Dealer Authority. He drinks a lot of coffee, usually in the form of a 5-shot espresso over ice. Find him on Twitter, Facebook, and Pinterest.

7 thoughts on “I was so going to blog about the Digg Town Hall Meeting, but…

  1. Wow! that’s so not cool! And insult to injury the persons we look up to when it comes to fighting the establishment,left early, probably realizing the fact that THEY are the “establishment” to the bloggers….

  2. I am also spam tagged on several domains, although I have not spammed ever. I have never been notified by digg about my supposed spamming, nor have they ever answered an email from me.

  3. If your experience is anything like what has happened on my blog (and up to this point our experiences are very similar), you will not get any contact from them even after you e-mail them. We have suffered the same fate, and kindly e-mailed Digg about it and never got a response. Truth be told, I have never heard of them responding to an e-mail sent from the site. Personally, I’m done with Digg. I don’t even check there once a week anymore. Submitting your content to Digg is like being a Walmart vendor. They have the dominant position so everyone submits to them but hates them at the same time.

  4. I certainly never received any communication from them despite encouraging it. I could be accused of spamming mine too possibly but this occured (due to my unawareness of the fact) AFTER being tagged. Mine has been tagged since it’s second submission, a point at which it could in no way be accused of being spammed.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>