Comments on: 11 of 15: Algo Change Gives New Diggers a (temp) Chance http://soshable.com/new-diggers/ People soshalize. They don't care how it's spelled. They just do it. Mon, 21 May 2012 21:04:19 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1 By: Linkjacking is Good, Bad, and Ugly | Soshable | Social Media Blog http://soshable.com/new-diggers/comment-page-1/#comment-221 Linkjacking is Good, Bad, and Ugly | Soshable | Social Media Blog Tue, 19 Feb 2008 06:23:22 +0000 http://soshable.com/new-diggers/#comment-221 [...] Social Media Blog can be linkjacked at any time.  For a recent article about a quirky spot in the Digg algorithm, click the link that you just [...] [...] Social Media Blog can be linkjacked at any time.  For a recent article about a quirky spot in the Digg algorithm, click the link that you just [...]

]]> By: Suxmonkey http://soshable.com/new-diggers/comment-page-1/#comment-55 Suxmonkey Sat, 26 Jan 2008 09:19:55 +0000 http://soshable.com/new-diggers/#comment-55 Old Diggers, New Diggers, I know I care. Digg was biased enough against veteran submitters before and it kept things in check. Now people submitting for the first time are hitting the front. When I was new I know I felt the same way as some other Diggers: 'why can't I make the front with good content?' Well, I've since learned that there is a trust factor too ... people are more likely to give your content a chance if you've been around and voted and commented on other good content. If it weren't that way, we'd all be sifting through thousands and thousands of submissions a day from scratch ... and they we might as well be combing the entire interwebs without Digg ;) Old Diggers, New Diggers, I know I care. Digg was biased enough against veteran submitters before and it kept things in check. Now people submitting for the first time are hitting the front. When I was new I know I felt the same way as some other Diggers: ‘why can’t I make the front with good content?’ Well, I’ve since learned that there is a trust factor too … people are more likely to give your content a chance if you’ve been around and voted and commented on other good content. If it weren’t that way, we’d all be sifting through thousands and thousands of submissions a day from scratch … and they we might as well be combing the entire interwebs without Digg ;)

]]> By: WordsnCollision http://soshable.com/new-diggers/comment-page-1/#comment-54 WordsnCollision Sat, 26 Jan 2008 01:49:44 +0000 http://soshable.com/new-diggers/#comment-54 Digidave says true - when will KR & JA give us the straight dope on auto-buries, "The Bury Brigade", banned sites and so on. Does "the community" decide on the content, or not? This IS a black & white ossue, there are no shades of gray. Digidave says true – when will KR & JA give us the straight dope on auto-buries, “The Bury Brigade”, banned sites and so on. Does “the community” decide on the content, or not? This IS a black & white ossue, there are no shades of gray.

]]> By: Digidave http://soshable.com/new-diggers/comment-page-1/#comment-53 Digidave Fri, 25 Jan 2008 23:41:45 +0000 http://soshable.com/new-diggers/#comment-53 Old diggers, new diggers. I don't care. What I want to know about are the: banned diggers, banned sites, secret editors. The problem isn't the algorithm - it's the lack of transparency. Old diggers, new diggers. I don’t care.

What I want to know about are the:
banned diggers, banned sites, secret editors.

The problem isn’t the algorithm – it’s the lack of transparency.

]]>