Google Search

Let’s call it what it really is, shall we? Despite efforts by Bing/Yahoo to stay relevant as well as efforts by Facebook and Twitter to enter the search game, there really is only one. For years, I’ve always had to add the caveat when discussing search marketing that “When I say Google, I mean Bing and Yahoo as well.”

I won’t be saying that any more. If we’re talking search, we’re talking Google.

It’s not that the others don’t exist. They do and they’re still somewhat relevant. Millions still use them on a daily basis so they cannot be ignored completely. However, when it comes to making decisions about search marketing, there’s only one algorithm that needs to be taken into account, one traffic source whose numbers should be used to steer the strategy.

The infographic below asks the question of whether or not Google is a monopoly. In reality, that’s not important, though the infographic points to a glaring fact that Google is the leader not only in market share but also in innovation and others, specifically Bing, are always just chasing the leader from a distance. The important takeaway is this: if you want to craft your strategy for search, particularly organic, mobile, and local search, then Google is the only thing to consider. Again, Bing and the other options are still valid, but if you build your strategy around Google, the others will eventually fall into line.

It’s been like that for a while. Google was the first to look at inbound links as a primary ranking factor and the others followed. Google was the first to truly integrate personalization and the others followed. Google was arguably the first to truly integrate social media into their search algorithm through the use of social signals, though in this case the competition wasn’t far behind. It doesn’t matter. Think Google when you’re thinking about your strategy and the rest will fall in line.

Paid search is a different thing altogether and many have found success with the cheaper clicks through other search engines, but even in that case the only way to truly hit a bulk level is through Google. Facebook is making strides in this arena, but they’re still worlds apart.

The funny part of it all is that Google is extremely vulnerable to manipulation, second only to Twitter when it comes to ease. Both rely more heavily on real-time data than the others, which is both their strength and vulnerability.

Here’s the graphic…

Is Google a Monopoly?
Source: Franchise Gator

Enhanced by Zemanta

Leave a Reply


  1. I can’t argue with this one! I have been doing SEO for such a long time, and when you are number 1 in Google is pays huge. When you are number 1 in Bing it is not even as close to as much traffic. This is a great infographic. Ill share!

  2. Google is synonymous with net search. It’s practically a verb now. You don’t see anyone saying “Yahoo it” or “Bing it.”

    As for being prone to manipulation, I think you hit the nail on the head. It’s a double edged sword. On one hand, you get great traffic if you know how to do it. On the other, you can’t find what exactly you’re looking for because of sites in the top results are too optimized.

    What do you think about DuckDuckGo?

  3. Undoubtedly, Google is synonymous with search. In fact, Google is search itself! This article is pointedly direct and true. In today’s world, it is unimaginable doing anything online without one assistance or the other from Google. They have a wonderful and winning strategy; and are working hard at it! Good exposition.

  4. Hi, This is Magnificent work ! And will personally recommend it
    to my friends. Thanks a million and please continue the enjoyable work.