When a group of us first started discussing the idea of having a mass blog campaign where Digg users would speak their mind about recent happenings at the top social media site, we considered many things. We didn’t want the posts to be guided — the bloggers’ own opinions were what mattered, not any agenda that we might have. We wanted to keep it open and free, and most of all, honest.
Tons of bloggers and non-bloggers alike have responded, sending me emails about how they really like the idea and want to contribute. That part was expected. The part that wasn’t expected has become very apparent and alarming.
Bloggers. Fear. Digg.
They want their voice heard, just not associated with their blog or Digg account. They think that Digg will either ban their account or put their blog on “autobury” (even though digg vehemently denies manual autoburies, only ’spam’ buried sites). Many do not want to give Digg any reason to go after them.
This is EXACTLY what we should have anticipated because it is exactly what we were hoping to fight against. Digg has become a platform of social media fear.
When squeaky clean but outspoken Diggers like Tamar Weinberg find themselves on the ban list, it becomes apparent that nobody is safe. Top Diggers, new diggers, and everyone in between have had their ranks reduced by these bans. On top of all that, it seems that there is a distinct change in the way that Digg is treating small and new blogs, so the fear extends there as well.
If you’re not the Huffington Post, ArsTechnica, TorrentFreak, or Cracked, you probably won’t hit the front page of Digg very often. That’s a completely different issue.
The issue that we didn’t anticipate, the extreme level of fear that is rampant, is comparable to Communist China. Freedom of speech at Digg is perceived as non-existent. Over digging is bad. Submitting an anti-Digg post is bad. Perhaps they are less like the Communist China and more like the Soup Nazi from Seinfeld. Sounds like another blog post, but I digress.
ATTN: CONCERNED DIGGERS WHO WANT TO SPEAK OUT, CAREFULLY
I am opening up Soshable for a 1 week batch of guest posts. If you have something to say, simply email a post to me with your name (or fake name if you want to be anonymous) and I will post it here, unedited. There are certain things that I won’t post – extreme profanity, terrible writing, pointless bashing – but otherwise, the blog is yours for a week. Send your posts to jd.rucker.oboy@gmail.com
Read more digg stories on this blog.




{ 3 trackbacks }
{ 11 comments… read them below or add one }
Jimmmmie….SUP…freak???
lol
Just my opinion… http://www.feloniousramblings.com/2008/10/my-take-on-digg.html
Yet another reason why Reddit is superior. I used to hit Digg so many times a day…. since the first time I saw Reddit I think i’ve been to Digg three times… when linked to it from Reddit.
Huh? Kevin Rose himself spoke to the marginal social relevance of DIGG recently.
Basically it’s a few million kids daily doing 10-15 things each.
“Bloggers fear DIGG” ?
I think not.
I joined Digg some two months ago. I had joined in the hope that my blog can get some recognition as like thousand others.
I started making friends and Digging articles. I use Firefox. So, I used to go to the friends submission section and open them in tabs and Digg them. I used to Digg about 400 to 500 daily.
Suddenly, without warning, one morning I found my account banned a fortnight ago. I received a email saying that Digg banned my account due to using a script. I tried to figure out what is a script by googling and came to some DiggMonkey or something like that script but I still don’t understand the matter.
Anyway I have joined Propeller and I am happy with my props!
My two Diggs worth: http://broadcasting-brain.com/2008/10/12/digg-lack/
Hi
I am working on a site which try to solve many of the problems with digg.com.
You can find it on http://crowdnews.eu.
The main problem with digg is the voting system.
When only top voted stories get on the front page it has
to be a subject that many can relate to,
which result in stories with a low information content.
Crowdnews solves this by using sharing instead of voting.
Every have a personal news page on which they can subscribe to other users and when those users share stories they will appear on the personal news page.
Join me on CrowdNews
Digg is like buying pay per click on Google and Yahoo. It’s mostly a fraud!
While many are unsatisfied with digg, I think it’s served a good purpose and opened the floodgates for other (better?) social news networks. I’ve found that propeller, reddit, fark and stumbleupon are all comparable and often more democratic.
fxqxblpw48z4f9at