1. Alex says

    With all due respect to the author of this piece, I disagree with the idea that a veto of CISPA could win Obama the election. He still signed the NDAA 2012. That alone should be enough to lose him the election.

  2. says

    It’s all about “Counter-Terrorism” … whether we like it or not … signing the NDAA 2012 was like sending a signal to the nation …

    ‘We will engage in counter-terrorism tactics … instead of deploying our entire armed forces to do it” …

    I’m sure that’s how Conservatives with more than three brain cells have understood it …

  3. says

    Apart from this, I figure the headline in this article deliberately misguiding … almost as blaming CISPA on POTUS … since, in case it’s “approved”, he’ll be the first ‘beneficiary’ of it … and it will all depend on his signature … POTUS’ opposition to CISPA should’ve been highlighted at the very headline … as it is, it simply doesn’t fit the very facts exposed by it …

  4. says

    Can th? c’s behi?d a web site manage by itself or ?hgould expert advice be sought.
    Some of yourr static pages to trry to improve increase range
    from:. It’s not merel? the big boys winning big though,
    outsourcing is a hug? savour forr the number of small companies, especially during the recent Globwl Financial Crisis.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>