Facebook User-Data Gathering Goes Viral

by JD Rucker on January 26, 2008 · 16 comments

FacebookWhen a company has news that they want buried, they issue their information on a Friday night and hope nobody in the media notices on Monday morning.  Marred in controversy over their Beacon advertising platform, Facebook hoped that their latest attempt to gather more user-data would go unnoticed.

For the most part, it’s worked so far. Developers will now be able to extend their Facebook applications to their own websites by using the formerly-closed JavaScript client library.  Since it does not require any server side code on the developer’s server, they can now create a Facebook application that can be hosted on any Web site that serves static HTML.  The result: putting a Facebook app on a website is now extremely simple.

This means that Facebook’s user-behavior data stream is about to go viral.

As Mashable noted, “Users could now go about the Web, doing your own thing, but still be connected to their Facebook profiles.”

In the quest for more user-data, Facebook has exchanged its exclusivity on its apps for a free flow of cookie-based information.  By using web apps to follow users through cookies, Facebook will be able to collect user data on any site that uses the API.  This isn’t new, but by opening up the JS client library, the number of sites using Facebook apps will grow exponentially.

The timing of the release on their developer’s news page was perfect.  They cannot afford another storm of bad press associated with collecting user data.  Possibly in an effort to “smokescreen” it even more, they preceded the announcement with a “juicier” bit of news earlier that day, a partnership with Amazon Web Services.

Three important things were noted by Nick O’Neill on his unofficial Facebook blog:

  1. “Somehow nobody has seemed to take note of this significant step.”
  2. “Facebook has now implemented the ability to leverage cookies to access a user’s data even when they are not at your application.”
  3. “This is a huge step in Facebook extending their platform beyond the Facebook.com domain and letting people leverage the power of the ’social graph’.”

The fact that nobody noticed the implications of this big news is by design. They will be better off easing this forward rather than blasting it over the intercom.  The last thing they need is another user data controversy.

John Potter, ZDNet’s chief of development, said in his article, “With this new library, the number of sites, and site owners, that can deploy Facebook applications just increased dramatically.”

If this is true, than Facebook has opened up a humongous hole through which behavioral data will be flying into their databases.

Read more on this social media blog or check out some of our social media recommendations.

Share it. The world should know:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Propeller
  • Reddit
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
  • TwitThis

{ 8 trackbacks }

Why Facebook Did *Not* Release Their Platform Last Night | Stay N' Alive
January 26, 2008 at 9:41 pm
» Blog Archive » Why Facebook did *not* release their platform on the 25th
January 27, 2008 at 3:03 pm
My daily readings 01/28/2008 « Strange Kite
January 28, 2008 at 3:37 am
test 01/28/2008 « Strange Kite
January 28, 2008 at 9:32 am
Anonymous
January 30, 2008 at 6:18 pm
bloggingzoom.com
February 2, 2008 at 12:21 pm
Social Blend 06 – Episode 668: The Neighbor of the Beast
February 7, 2008 at 6:15 pm
Stop Clicking Banners and Maybe They'll Go Away | Soshable | Social Media Blog
February 18, 2008 at 10:21 pm

{ 8 comments… read them below or add one }

Joey Tyson January 26, 2008 at 8:05 pm

I think this is being way overstated. From what I understand, this library only provides JavaScript access to what PHP and other server-side developers have used for some time. For an application using the new library to access any Facebook data, the user will still have to login to the application, just as web sites accessing the Facebook API do now. The only difference is how the site accesses the API – previously it was only server-side, now it can be done client-side. This is not a cookie-based, automatic login system. This is simply a client-side version of the API technology that’s been in use for months.

JD Rucker January 26, 2008 at 8:33 pm

Absolutely. It definitely isn’t automatic login, but if you’re logged in to your Facebook account at all times, as most users are, the data will be collected. It’s no different than before, except instead of hundreds of sites having the apps, it will be thousands.

ar-lock January 27, 2008 at 8:15 am

all the facebook apps suck anyways, what are you afraid of that one app will be so good that you will be willingto give up you “profile” information to use it?

hmmm, why do you think they spend money developing said apps?

most people still use windows for pete’s sake.
their computer is already defiling them continually.
its a naturall progression.

whelping February 23, 2008 at 9:09 am
levitra online February 25, 2008 at 4:59 am

Hi webmaster!

Over Night Cash System March 26, 2008 at 9:46 am

This is an incredible blog, with highly effective information. I do recommend this for anyone to read.

stephanazs September 20, 2008 at 6:59 am

Interesting facts.I have bookmarked this site. stephanazs

Free Examples Of Online Dating Profiles May 1, 2009 at 7:00 pm

Hi

Leave a Comment